OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
wsbpel
160 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 31 Dec 2003 16:05:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 30 Dec 2003 20:17:01 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 24 Dec 2003 18:28:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 13 - Updated Proposed Resolution]
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 24 Dec 2003 18:03:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 24 Dec 2003 17:55:57 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 13 - Updated Proposed Resolution]
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 23 Dec 2003 19:46:51 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 13 - Updated Proposed Resolution]
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 23 Dec 2003 18:22:27 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 23 Dec 2003 18:07:36 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 23 Dec 2003 17:53:07 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 13 - Updated Proposed Resolution]
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 23 Dec 2003 02:21:28 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 13 - Updated Proposed Resolution]
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 23 Dec 2003 00:51:25 -0000
Groups - Implementation subgroup modified
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 19 Dec 2003 18:30:27 -0000
Groups - Issues coordination subgroup added
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 19 Dec 2003 16:01:31 -0000
Groups - Implementation subgroup added
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 19 Dec 2003 15:59:00 -0000
Groups - WS BPEL TC conference call added
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 19 Dec 2003 15:56:49 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Groups - RosettaNet-Demo.zip uploaded
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 18 Dec 2003 19:11:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 18 Dec 2003 18:11:10 -0000
Groups - RosettaNet-Demo.zip uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 18 Dec 2003 17:15:33 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] VisualScript V2.0 download
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 18 Dec 2003 17:07:20 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 18 Dec 2003 06:49:46 -0000
VisualScript V2.0 download
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 18 Dec 2003 03:30:21 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes
From
"Jim Clune" <jim@parasoft.com> on 16 Dec 2003 21:17:10 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executableprocesses
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 16 Dec 2003 18:21:58 -0000
Groups - Use Case Conference Call cancelled
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 16 Dec 2003 10:53:09 -0000
Groups - WSBPEL-F2F-minutes-2003-12-09.html uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 16 Dec 2003 10:48:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 16 Dec 2003 07:35:37 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 16 Dec 2003 06:26:31 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes
From
"Jim Clune" <jim@parasoft.com> on 15 Dec 2003 21:32:23 -0000
Minutes for f2f 9th Dec, from 1530.
From
"Husband, Yin-Leng" <yin-leng.husband@hp.com> on 15 Dec 2003 02:02:25 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executableprocesses
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Dec 2003 04:54:22 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 13 Dec 2003 01:14:02 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executableprocesses
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 13 Dec 2003 00:25:24 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 12 Dec 2003 23:37:27 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 12 Dec 2003 23:19:54 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 12 Dec 2003 22:32:50 -0000
Groups - Minutes of Conference Call November 26.htm uploaded
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 12 Dec 2003 22:21:11 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 12 Dec 2003 21:51:35 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 12 Dec 2003 21:49:13 -0000
Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 12 Dec 2003 20:46:04 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 12 Dec 2003 20:33:09 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 12 Dec 2003 17:39:02 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 12 Dec 2003 01:19:10 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 11 Dec 2003 23:35:10 -0000
Face to face follow up
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 11 Dec 2003 21:08:38 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] ping! Anyone at the f2f? Phones down?
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 10 Dec 2003 19:38:00 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] ping! Anyone at the f2f? Phones down?
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 10 Dec 2003 19:06:54 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] ping! Anyone at the f2f? Phones down?
From
Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com> on 10 Dec 2003 18:40:45 -0000
ping! Anyone at the f2f? Phones down?
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 10 Dec 2003 18:02:52 -0000
Groups - CEFACT BPWG Update.PDF uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 10 Dec 2003 17:12:49 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue 13 - Updated Proposed Resolution]
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 10 Dec 2003 16:52:46 -0000
Groups - Standards Stack Diagram 12-10-03.png uploaded
From
mike.gilger@identitech.com on 10 Dec 2003 16:52:33 -0000
Groups - Use-Case-12-10-F2F.PDF uploaded
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 10 Dec 2003 16:51:01 -0000
Issue 16: -- Proposed resolution (Ensuring exactly once)
From
"Marin, Mike" <MMarin@filenet.com> on 10 Dec 2003 16:43:32 -0000
[wsbpel] Issue 13 - Updated Proposed Resolution]
From
rkhalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com> on 10 Dec 2003 16:34:32 -0000
LIAISON: In depth WS-CAF presentation
From
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> on 10 Dec 2003 16:26:20 -0000
Groups - WS-CAF cut down.ppt uploaded
From
martin.chapman@oracle.com on 10 Dec 2003 16:17:48 -0000
Groups - Liaison2BPEL12092003.ppt uploaded
From
martin.chapman@oracle.com on 10 Dec 2003 16:13:42 -0000
face to face agenda for Wed Dec 10
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 10 Dec 2003 14:28:13 -0000
Defining Business Process Fusion
From
Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org> on 10 Dec 2003 12:02:09 -0000
Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 9 Dec 2003 21:41:35 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue 13 - Proposed Resolution
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 9 Dec 2003 21:24:15 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Groups - Default Compensation Order.ppt uploaded
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 9 Dec 2003 20:56:19 -0000
Coordination paper (WSCA)
From
Sid Askary <saskary@nuperus.com> on 9 Dec 2003 20:06:03 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] process coordination ideas
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 9 Dec 2003 19:42:35 -0000
Groups - Process Coordination in BPEL CounterProposal-extended.ppt uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 9 Dec 2003 16:56:17 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 9 Dec 2003 16:50:03 -0000
face to face agenda update
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 9 Dec 2003 16:12:47 -0000
Groups - Default Compensation Order.ppt uploaded
From
drj@us.ibm.com on 9 Dec 2003 15:44:31 -0000
presentation for face to face
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 9 Dec 2003 15:40:34 -0000
Face to face update
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 9 Dec 2003 15:23:52 -0000
12/9/2003: Draft Multi-Start Activity Use Case
From
"Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM> on 9 Dec 2003 13:10:38 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Last call for RSVPs
From
"Layna Fischer" <layna@wfmc.org> on 8 Dec 2003 18:11:24 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Last call for RSVPs
From
Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net> on 8 Dec 2003 17:16:41 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Last call for RSVPs
From
"Ben Bloch" <ben_b54@hotmail.com> on 8 Dec 2003 17:13:36 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] process coordination ideas - counter-proposal revised
From
"Haugen Robert" <Robert.Haugen@choreology.com> on 8 Dec 2003 11:21:05 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] process coordination ideas
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 8 Dec 2003 06:04:35 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] process coordination ideas - counter-proposal
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 8 Dec 2003 05:08:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] process coordination ideas - counter-proposal
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 8 Dec 2003 00:20:29 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] process coordination ideas - counter-proposal
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 7 Dec 2003 22:11:59 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] process coordination ideas - counter-proposal
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 7 Dec 2003 21:34:05 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] process coordination ideas - counter-proposal
From
"Haugen Robert" <Robert.Haugen@choreology.com> on 7 Dec 2003 20:09:30 -0000
[wsbpel] Issue 13 - Proposed Resolution
From
rkhalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com> on 7 Dec 2003 18:50:23 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] process coordination ideas
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 6 Dec 2003 19:23:15 -0000
BPEL at XML2003
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 6 Dec 2003 19:19:06 -0000
BCM brochure now available
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 6 Dec 2003 19:05:41 -0000
Groups - BPEL F2F Meeting modified
From
jevdemon@microsoft.com on 6 Dec 2003 15:34:32 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Last call for RSVPs
From
"Brown, Steve" <SBrown@Metastorm.com> on 6 Dec 2003 13:35:58 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] process coordination ideas
From
"Haugen Robert" <Robert.Haugen@choreology.com> on 6 Dec 2003 11:37:27 -0000
Info and Agenda for Dec. 9-10 face to face meeting
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 6 Dec 2003 06:03:50 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Last call for RSVPs
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 5 Dec 2003 23:31:19 -0000
Last call for RSVPs
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 5 Dec 2003 21:30:50 -0000
process coordination ideas
From
"Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com> on 5 Dec 2003 20:40:57 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 88 - Import Errata
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 5 Dec 2003 19:55:31 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Agenda for Dec f2f?
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 5 Dec 2003 18:46:42 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 88 - Import Errata
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 5 Dec 2003 18:32:28 -0000
Agenda for Dec f2f?
From
Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com> on 5 Dec 2003 18:31:37 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] BPEL licensing - deja vue / resolution
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 5 Dec 2003 17:52:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] BPEL licensing - deja vue / resolution
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 5 Dec 2003 17:45:26 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] BPEL licensing - deja vue / resolution
From
Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net> on 5 Dec 2003 16:10:39 -0000
BPEL licensing - deja vue / resolution
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 5 Dec 2003 15:04:39 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 88 - Import Errata
From
Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> on 5 Dec 2003 04:26:43 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 5 Dec 2003 00:38:41 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 4 Dec 2003 22:13:48 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 4 Dec 2003 22:04:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 4 Dec 2003 20:21:04 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue 74 - proposal for vote
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 4 Dec 2003 16:49:00 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 4 Dec 2003 15:58:57 -0000
Groups - wsbpel-specification-draft-Nov2303.htm modified
From
pyendluri@webmethods.com on 4 Dec 2003 15:52:50 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 88 - Import Errata
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 4 Dec 2003 00:02:15 -0000
Your review requested for latest specification working draft
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 3 Dec 2003 23:05:52 -0000
Fabienne Marquardt/Germany/IBM is out of the office.
From
"Fabienne Marquardt" <FABIENNE@de.ibm.com> on 3 Dec 2003 22:52:03 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 3 Dec 2003 22:37:51 -0000
Issue - 88 - Import Errata
From
ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com> on 3 Dec 2003 22:02:14 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Federated Processes and BPMS Topology
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 3 Dec 2003 19:23:08 -0000
Groups - wsbpel-specification-draft-Nov2303.htm uploaded
From
pyendluri@webmethods.com on 3 Dec 2003 19:11:21 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Federated Processes and BPMS Topology
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 3 Dec 2003 18:27:02 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Federated Processes and BPMS Topology
From
"Carpenter, Robert E" <robert.e.carpenter@intel.com> on 3 Dec 2003 18:12:32 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 3 Dec 2003 17:59:31 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 3 Dec 2003 17:57:18 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 3 Dec 2003 17:37:52 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 3 Dec 2003 17:23:53 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Federated Processes and BPMS Topology
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 3 Dec 2003 17:07:41 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue 74 - proposal for vote
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 3 Dec 2003 16:56:43 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 3 Dec 2003 16:35:52 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 3 Dec 2003 15:55:06 -0000
Federated Processes and BPMS Topology
From
Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org> on 3 Dec 2003 15:00:23 -0000
Convergence of Standards - Fun - Phase 2 Was: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process
From
Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org> on 3 Dec 2003 12:54:40 -0000
Vertical Industry Standards - SAP announcement/BPMI role
From
Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org> on 3 Dec 2003 11:39:54 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org> on 3 Dec 2003 10:09:39 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Why I think a no vote is appropriate
From
"Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com> on 3 Dec 2003 09:48:33 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 3 Dec 2003 09:38:05 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Why I think a no vote is appropriate
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 3 Dec 2003 02:29:42 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 2 Dec 2003 21:28:01 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] voting on issue 77
From
Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> on 2 Dec 2003 20:31:44 -0000
Groups - wsbpel_issues_list.html uploaded
From
peter.furniss@choreology.com on 2 Dec 2003 19:28:58 -0000
Groups - scenarios12-2.zip uploaded
From
rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com on 2 Dec 2003 19:14:29 -0000
Issue - 77 - Why I think a no vote is appropriate
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 2 Dec 2003 18:24:11 -0000
Licensing lssues for Small Vendors
From
Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org> on 2 Dec 2003 15:54:34 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] The sad tail of obtaining licenses for BPEL4WS 1.1mailto:eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 2 Dec 2003 13:56:54 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] The sad tail of obtaining licenses for BPEL4WS 1.1mailto:eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org
From
Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net> on 2 Dec 2003 08:50:58 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 75 - Do we need locally declared partnerLinks?
From
Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> on 2 Dec 2003 04:54:40 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue 74 - proposal for vote
From
"Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de> on 2 Dec 2003 01:05:44 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 2 Dec 2003 00:35:18 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] The sad tail of obtaining licenses for BPEL4WS 1.1mailto:eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 2 Dec 2003 00:16:37 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] The sad tail of obtaining licenses for BPEL4WS 1.1
From
"John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com> on 1 Dec 2003 23:42:18 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 1 Dec 2003 23:18:03 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] The sad tail of obtaining licenses for BPEL4WS1.1mailto:eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org
From
Harvey Reed <hreed@sonicsoftware.com> on 1 Dec 2003 21:44:06 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] The sad tail of obtaining licenses for BPEL4WS 1.1mailto:eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 1 Dec 2003 21:34:21 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] The sad tail of obtaining licenses for BPEL4WS 1.1mailto:eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org
From
Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net> on 1 Dec 2003 21:26:16 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 1 Dec 2003 21:07:40 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 1 Dec 2003 20:53:03 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue 74 - proposal for vote
From
"Yaron Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> on 1 Dec 2003 19:46:02 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions
From
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> on 1 Dec 2003 18:38:21 -0000
voting on issue 77
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 1 Dec 2003 18:12:01 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 77 - Under specified operation definitions
From
Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM> on 1 Dec 2003 18:02:23 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] The sad tail of obtaining licenses for BPEL4WS 1.1mailto:eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org
From
"Martin Ader" <ader@wngs.com> on 1 Dec 2003 17:52:34 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] The sad tail of obtaining licenses for BPEL4WS1.1mailto:eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org
From
Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com> on 1 Dec 2003 17:24:41 -0000
RE: [wsbpel] The sad tail of obtaining licenses for BPEL4WS 1.1mailto:eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org
From
"Derick Townsend [Openstorm]" <dt@openstorm.com> on 1 Dec 2003 17:24:20 -0000
The sad tail of obtaining licenses for BPEL4WS 1.1mailto:eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org
From
Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net> on 1 Dec 2003 16:06:41 -0000
Re: [wsbpel] Does better Nath lead to better process
From
Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org> on 1 Dec 2003 13:53:25 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2