Re: [wsbpel] Does better Nath lead to better process

[Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org>]

BPEL TC

I have done as Jon asked, and responded to his paper through a couple of posts at the forum he suggested.
Sorry for the delay, but I have been traveling on CSC business.

http://www.workflow-research.de/Forums/index.php?s=c57511bb9b9096f362fca454165aa386&act=SF&f=10

Howard

At 11:21 AM 11/16/2003 +0000, Jon Pyke wrote:
>Dear BPEL Members:
>
>This message is to advise you that a paper has been posted to <http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/better_maths_better_processes.pdf>http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/better_maths_better_processes.pdf
>
>Entitled Does Better Math Lead to Better Business Processes? this paper by Jon Pyke and Roger Whitehead describes why Business Process Management and its predecessor, workflow management, are not simply an extension to the theory of pi-calculus and why pi-calculus is not the only answer to the BPM debate.
>
>This rather off-topic discussion on BPM will no longer be pursued through this BPEL list, my apologies for any inconvenience.
>
>If you wish to debate this paper, please use the more appropriate discussion forum of Joint Meeting BPMI-WfMC at
><http://www.workflow-research.de/Forums/index.php?s=c57511bb9b9096f362fca454165aa386&act=SF&f=10>http://www.workflow-research.de/Forums/index.php?s=c57511bb9b9096f362fca454165aa386&act=SF&f=10
>
>Jon Pyke 
>
>Chair WfMC