Issue - 94 - Allowing a mix of "compensate" and other activities within a compensation handler or a fault handler

[ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list. The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent document with the title in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.

Issue - 94 - Allowing a mix of "compensate" and other activities within a compensation handler or a fault handler

Status: open
Date added: 2 Feb 2004
Submitter: Ugo Corda
Date submitted: 28 January 2004
Description: The BPEL Schema only allows a single activity to be specified within a 
compensation handler or a catch clause in a fault handler. In case multiple activities 
need to be specified, they can grouped together under a "group" activity like <sequence> 
or <flow>. But that still does not allow mixing "compensate" with other activities, because 
the current syntax of sequence, flow, etc. exclude the presence of "compensate" among its children.
Changes: 2 Feb 2004 - new issue

---

To comment on this issue, please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 94 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message.

To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).