wsbpel message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Issue 42 - Proposal to vote
- From: "Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>
- To: <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:19:53 -0000
Title: Message
Proposal: Close
without change to the specification
Rationale: Although
the use and definitions of formalisms can be useful in understanding and
defining a specification, including such in a formal description as normative in
a specification that is also in natural language and less formal expressions has
the drawbacks:
a) it is a very
large effort, and can significantly delay the completion of the
specification
b) formal
specifications tend to be understood only by a few and many of the subject-area
experts will use and think in terms of the non-formal description, in
development of both the specification and implementations.
c) if there is
conflict between the formal and non-formal which is to have precedence
?
Separate formal
descriptions of bpel, not included in the specification and without normative
authority are to be encouraged.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]