Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 97 - Optional Variable References in AbstractProcesses

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

> Yiu: Hi DK,
> Thanks for the clarification.
> I am also just referring to the schema used in Issue 24 conversation, 
> supplied by Paco.
> I presume that is one of the most recent schema. Paco can confirm one 
> way or the other.
>
> BTW, during discussion of issue 24, some of us discovered that there 
> were some type XSD-level semantics typo / error. It may be a good idea 
> to have a separate XSD file (not just only embedded in the main spec) 
> available from oasis-open.org website. That will make it easier for us 
> to plug the XSD file into any XSD-tool to play with it.
>
> That separate XSD file would be maintained by spec editing sub-group 
> also. So, we can be sure the spec and the XSD will be in sync.


mm1: Doesn't this bring up actually that Issues 91 and 97 should be 
resolved in line with Issue 24? Aren't we seeing differentiation between 
common elements or those specific to either the abstract or executable 
process? Thanks.