Re: [wsbpel] Issue 103 - Good Idea!

[Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>]

+1

We've been using XPath variables in that capacity (1.0 and 2.0) and it 
works pretty well. The mapping from a WSDL-defined message to an infoset 
is fairly straight forward and you get the benefit of static analysis 
and no special restrictions on the usage of XPath 1.0/2.0 or XQuery.

Assaf

Yaron Y. Goland wrote:

> The more I think about 103 the better an idea I think it is.
>
> I wonder if we couldn't possibly make it work for WSDL types messages? 
> Could we say that if the variable is of type WSDL message then there 
> MUST be at least one path segment attached to it and that the path 
> segment MUST be the name of a part in the WSDL message?
>
>         Yaron
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster 
> of the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
>



begin:vcard
fn:Assaf Arkin
n:Arkin;Assaf
org:Intalio
adr:;;1900 S. Norfolk St #900;San Mateo;CA;94403;USA
email;internet:arkin@intalio.com
title:Chief Architect
tel;work:650 577 4700
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.intalio.com
version:2.1
end:vcard