Enough is enough in the field of BPM: We don't need BPELJ: BPML semantics are just fine (or is it back to the 3GLs?)

[Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org>]

My view at:

www.bpm3.com/bpelj

Comments welcome.

Howard

At 01:12 PM 3/25/2004 -0800, Yaron Y. Goland wrote:
>Although it has been in the news I thought I would still send a note pointing out that BEA and IBM have recently released a joint whitepaper describing our shared vision for how BPEL and Java should work together called BPELJ. This whitepaper will be submitted for consideration by JSR 207 in the JCP.
>
>BPELJ is a consumer of the BPEL standard and so I hope the BPELJ effort will be able to contribute practical feedback on what it's like to use BPEL.
>
>You can find out more about BPELJ at:
>http://ftpna2.bea.com/pub/downloads/ws-bpelj.pdf
>and
>ftp://www6.software.ibm.com/software/developer/library/ws-bpelj.pdf
>
>        Thanks,
>                Yaron
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.

---

New Book - Business Process Management: The Third Wave
www.bpm3.com

Howard Smith/CSC/BPMI.org
cell +44 7711 594 494 (operates worldwide, dial UK)
office +44 20 8660 1963