RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG

[Frank Leymann <LEY1@de.ibm.com>]

+1

There is a huge investment in XML-based tooling, developer/modeler skill,
teaching material, industry acceptance, standards based on XML/XSD etc
etc..  Why should we give that up, or even indicate by using RNG that "XSD
is inferior" to RNG?

Regards,
Frank







To:    "Ron Ten-Hove" <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>
cc:    <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject:    RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG


Forgive me for what may be a naive question, but how would this impact
toolkit support, given that almost all current SOAP toolkits leverage W3C
XML Schema?  Would this not hinder interop and adoption, at least in the
SOAP based SOA world?

Regards,
Jonathan Anderson
Booz Allen Hamilton

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Ten-Hove [mailto:Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:04 PM
To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG


Folks,

    I'd like to add my own +1 to Yaron's suggestion that we use RelaxNG
as our schema language. The increase in readability and expressiveness
will more that make up for any pain incurred by the TC in making the
transition.

    Are there any other specs that are making use of RelaxNG in a
normative way?

-Ron

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup
.
php.


To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php
.