Re: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Ugo,

I think this is a moot point anyway - because I can see lots
of things that RELAX can't handle too (and I am on
the RELAX TC).

I'm not even sure that CAM templates can handle 
all the kooky syntax nuances either (e.g. validating 
XPath expressions as parameters) - but at least 
the declarative approach probably gets you closest - and 
you can use *context* to drive the particular details of the 
implementation that you as a vendor have woven in 
different to everyone else.

Having a default RELAX schema and XSD and a 
CAM template are however excellent ways of 
documenting the intention behind the specification in
a formal way.

I'd say this is something that is easy to duck - but won't 
actually go away that easy.

In CAM we had a volunteer graft and creating the CAM
for CAM and the XSD for CAM.  That's paying off as
people are able to use those reference documents in
interesting ways within tools.