Re: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

I don't think schematron does as good a job of meeting our needs as 
RelaxNG. The key difference in my mind is that schematron is really a 
XSLT style programming language whose purpose happens to be to validate 
schemas.

RelaxNG is a schema description language which can then be validated.

It's a question of do you want to express your schema as a first order 
artifact (as in RelaxNG) or do you want to express it as a side effect 
(as in running Schematron code and validating the XML).

I like first order artifacts myself. But I realize that is a personal 
preference.

		Yaron

Maciej Szefler wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 08:00, Eckenfels. Bernd wrote:
> 
>  > +1 from me too, however I wonder if anybody is using a declarative 
> language to express static analysis restrictions? That would be good to 
> share the same syntax. Currently we do some stuff with XSLT "test" 
> transformations, but thats not the stuff I can share, in the current 
> way. But any XML assertion language which supports stuff like "for any x 
> where y must be z" would be nice.
> 
> Try Schematron:
> http://xml.ascc.net/resource/schematron/schematron.html
> 
> -maciej
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
> the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
> 
>