[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote
It is also unclear what the semantics of a URI used in this way would be -- URIs don't have a native resolution mechanism so everyone is free to interpret them as they like. I see no way to provide semantics for these URIs in BPEL. This apart from the arguments Dieter gave below which I support. Satish -----Original Message----- From: Dieter Koenig1 [mailto:dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 9:43 AM To: Kristofer Agren Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 90 - Proposal to vote Kristofer, the BPEL spec expresses that deployment-related issues are out of scope. In addition, I believe they should be kept orthogonal to the process model. For access to common data, the spec also has explicit statements: "All external resources and partners are represented as WSDL services." "BPEL4WS, builds on WSDL by assuming that all external interactions of the business process occur through Web Service operations."
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]