[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Proposal for Vote
Yaron, I think it is too restrictive: an opaque activity is the place holder for any number of activities (including zero activities)... Cheers, dieter "Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> To 05/06/2004 01:43 wsbpeltc AM <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org> cc Please respond to Subject ygoland [wsbpel] Issue - 107 - Proposal for Vote An activity called 'opaque' shall be introduced for the exclusive use of abstract processes. The opaque activity's semantics are that it is a place holder for a single activity. The author of an executable complement of an abstract process has sole discretion as to what activity to replace an opaque activity with. A QNAME bpel:opaque where the bpel namespace shall be the URI used by the bpel spec for its own namespace shall be made available for use as the value of any BPEL attributes in a BPEL abstract process that accept a QNAME. The reserved QNAME's semantics are that it is a place holder for some other QNAME. The author of an executable complement of an abstract process has sole discretion as to what QNAME to replace a reserved QNAME with. To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php .
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]