[ws-bpel] 5/28/2004: Issue 34 Discussion

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

Paco, Dieter and Satish,

I am glad that you recognize that a viable solution has been submitted 
to W3C.   I'm referring to Paco's two posts (excerpts below). He most 
reasonably states:

1. I was pointing out that things seem to be moving, after the recent 
w3c submission......on the other hand, if a submitted document were to 
become the seed of a working group we would have a clear reference point 
to build upon...
2. ....Recent submissions to W3C have made many of us hopeful that some 
clarification of this space may be on the horizon.

With the WS-MessageDelivery submission to W3C as a technical note, are 
you saying you would accept its inclusion in the WS-BPEL specification? 
Could you clarify and explain what you mean by "clarification....may be 
on the horizon"? Is this a reference to some action there on behalf of 
WS-Addressing in the next two months? Do you have information that you 
can share with us? That would be great and help continue our progression 
in a timely manner. Thanks.

====================================================================================================================
Francisco Curbera wrote:
Ron,

I was pointing out that things seem to be moving, after the recent w3c
submission. Waiting for standards is clearly not a requirements, as our
position wrt WSDL 2.0 shows. on the other hand, if a submitted document
were to become the seed of a working group we would have a clear reference
point to build upon. Since a delay of this decision comes at essentially no
price, it seems unnecessary to rush to close it.

Paco