[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-bpel] Issue 34 Discussion - was 5/28/2004: ditto
Please don't put anything in front of the Issue ## on messages to this list if you want them linked to in the issues list. The scripts prune out Re: and [ws-bpel] (and even several occurances of either, but then look for Issue. (which means you can deliberately have something NOT linked by having a subject like "Suppress discussion on Issue 116" I've linked in Monica and Paco's messages by hand. Following up to this message should get the thread back on automatic. Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Francisco Curbera [mailto:curbera@us.ibm.com] > Sent: 29 May 2004 23:43 > To: Monica J. Martin > Cc: Dieter Koenig1; Satish Thatte; 'Wsbpel@Lists. Oasis-Open. > Org (E-mail)' > Subject: [wsbpel] Re: [ws-bpel] 5/28/2004: Issue 34 Discussion > > > > > > > Monica, > > I think we agree that things may be changing in the near > future. The conclusion I draw is that we should take some > time to see how they evolves before rushing to resolve in one > direction, then having to revisit the issue. I think this is > the only reasonable thing to do now. > > Paco > > > > > > > > "Monica J. > > > Martin" To: > Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, Satish Thatte > <satisht@microsoft.com>, > <Monica.Martin@Su Dieter > Koenig1 <dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com>, "'Wsbpel@Lists. > Oasis-Open. Org (E-mail)'" > n.COM> > <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org> > > cc: > > > 05/28/2004 06:35 Subject: > [ws-bpel] 5/28/2004: Issue 34 Discussion > > PM > > > > > > > > > > Paco, Dieter and Satish, > > I am glad that you recognize that a viable solution has been submitted > to W3C. I'm referring to Paco's two posts (excerpts below). He most > reasonably states: > > 1. I was pointing out that things seem to be moving, after > the recent w3c submission......on the other hand, if a > submitted document were to become the seed of a working group > we would have a clear reference point to build upon... 2. > ....Recent submissions to W3C have made many of us hopeful > that some clarification of this space may be on the horizon. > > With the WS-MessageDelivery submission to W3C as a technical > note, are you saying you would accept its inclusion in the > WS-BPEL specification? Could you clarify and explain what you > mean by "clarification....may be on the horizon"? Is this a > reference to some action there on behalf of WS-Addressing in > the next two months? Do you have information that you can > share with us? That would be great and help continue our > progression in a timely manner. Thanks. > > ============================================================== > ====================================================== > > Francisco Curbera wrote: > Ron, > > I was pointing out that things seem to be moving, after the > recent w3c submission. Waiting for standards is clearly not a > requirements, as our position wrt WSDL 2.0 shows. on the > other hand, if a submitted document were to become the seed > of a working group we would have a clear reference point to > build upon. Since a delay of this decision comes at > essentially no price, it seems unnecessary to rush to close it. > > Paco > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/le > ave_workgroup.php. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]