[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 37 - Proposal for vote
Once I'd got myself straight on start activities (createInstance="yes"), I understood. It might be worth including something brief on what the 6 possible combinations of createInstance (for the process) and initiate (for a correlation set) mean (createInstance="yes", initiate="no" would be illegal, if I've got it right). Doesn't the rule about non-start inbound activities needing at least one initiate="no" correlation set apply when there is a initiate="yes" as well ? (In fact, the rule would seem to be just the first half of that sentence). Presumably the multi-start example gets revised with this. Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Yiu [mailto:alex.yiu@oracle.com] > Sent: 15 June 2004 22:38 > To: Alex Yiu > Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; Yuzo Fujishima; Satish > Thatte; Dieter Koenig1; Yaron Y. Goland; Nickolas Kavantzas > Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 37 - Proposal for vote > > > > Uploaded the HTML file to www.oasis-open.org website. > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.p > hp/7281/Issue_37_Proposal_Draft.html > > Regards, > Alex Yiu > > > Alex Yiu wrote: > > > > > Hi, all, > > > > Here is the latest revised proposal for vote for Issue 37. Satish, > > Yaron, Dieter, Yuzo, Nick and I worked together on this proposal. > > > > The "initiate" attribute becomes a tri-value switch. And, > the proposal > > provides details of the semantics of different cases. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Regards, > > Alex Yiu > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/le > ave_workgroup.php. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]