RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 43 - Proposal to Vote

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

Yaron,

Could you also add your thoughts on why this is a "must have"?  I recall
a discussion long ago where no one was able to argue convincingly that
it is a must have.

Satish

-----Original Message-----
From: Yaron Y. Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 2:46 PM
To: wsbpeltc
Subject: [wsbpel] Issue - 43 - Proposal to Vote

Proposal: The syntax for onAlarm element be changed to:

<onAlarm for="duration-expr"? until="deadline-expr"? 
repeatEvery="duration-expr"?>
    activity
</onAlarm>

Only one of three attributes may appear on an onAlarm. The semantics of 
repeatEvery is that from the time that the event handler is instantiated

until it is un-instantiated an event handler will be created every 
duration-expr period. Like onEvent handlers each onAlarm handler created

as a consequence of a repeatEvery exists independently of all other 
instances.


To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgr
oup.php.