Re: [wsbpel] Error: Error handling process?

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

> Jordan: Hi Yuzo,
> These should probably opened as issues.   If the error amounts to a 
> simple editing change, it doesn't need to go through the issues 
> process - an email to the spec editing team is sufficient.   All other 
> items should have issues opened so everyone can review and we have a 
> way to keep track.  If you feel an item should be reviewed by the full 
> TC and the solution is fairly apparent,  I'd suggest that you open an 
> issue and submit a proposal to vote with the suggested resolution 
> promptly thereafter.  The issues list has a field called "qualifier" 
> where you could indicate that this is an error.   At present, this 
> field indentified various types of issues (typo, clarification, 
> enhancement, requirement and so on ) although I'm not sure its been 
> used extensively.
> I agree that the increase in the number of issues for these is ok.  I 
> am not so concerned with how many we open but  rather that we continue 
> to make  progress resolving them.   

mm1: Has this then been opened as an issue? Thanks.

> ....Fujishima: Anyway, here is the error I found:
> The last sentence in 14.8. Event Handlers
>  "... In addition, the outputVariable attribute is not optional
>   for invoke when the operation concerned is a request/response
>   operation."
> should be removed because this is irrelevant to event handlers.
> (Seems like a cut-and-paste remainder.)