Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 130 - Proposal to Vote

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

I admit that I completely forgot about our agreement to give the 
abstract folks more time to chew on this. I apologize for my 
forgetfulness and have no problem delaying a vote on this issue until 
the abstract process group can come to a resolution.

	Yaron

Prasad Yendluri wrote:

>   Yaron,
> 
> I thought 130 was created so that this issue is captured but, I thought 
> we were going to hold off on killing the Partners construct until the 
> abstract BPEL effort shows no use for it. Please see our emails on this 
> at [1] and [2].
> 
> This would seem a low hanging fruit (and tempting :) but, considering it 
> is more difficult to put things in than take them out, can we defer this 
> a bit?
> 
> [1]  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200407/msg00014.html
> [2]  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200407/msg00025.html
> 
> Regards, Prasad
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	[wsbpel] Issue - 130 - Proposal to Vote
> Date: 	Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:10:46 -0700
> From: 	Yaron Y. Goland <ygoland@bea.com> <mailto:ygoland@bea.com>
> Reply-To: 	ygoland@bea.com <mailto:ygoland@bea.com>
> Organization: 	BEA
> To: 	wsbpeltc <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org> 
> <mailto:wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> 
> I propose that we remove the Business Partners concept (e.g. section 7.3 
> and related text) from the BPEL specification.
> 
> 
>