RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 151 - Allow a new process instance to be created by "pick onAlarm until"

["Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>]

Thank you, Yaron, but you should know that I am currently on vacation
and I won't be back before 8/10. I won't have much time to spend on this
before then.

If you guys want to go ahead and vote on this on a coming meeting it
would be fine with me. I personally don't feel particularly strongly
about this issue, even though I championed it on behalf of the BPEL
development group at my company who originally raised the issue. (I have
not received any additional feedback from that group recently, so I
suspect they might not feel too strongly about it either - hey guys, if
this is not the case make your voice heard ;-).

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yaron Y. Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:15 AM
> To: Monica J. Martin
> Cc: Ron Ten-Hove; Prasad Yendluri; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 151 - Allow a new process 
> instance to be created by "pick onAlarm until"
> 
> 
> I had considered just putting forward a motion to close the issue 
> without change to the spec but I felt that would be disrespectful to 
> Ugo. I wanted to give him a chance to make his arguments and 
> ideally to 
> put up his own proposal for vote.
> 
> 		Yaron
> 
> Monica J. Martin wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Yaron Y. Goland wrote:
> > 
> >  > I just wanted to go on the record as saying that I 
> believe this  > 
> > feature is an issue for deployment/configuration and 
> therefore out of  
> > > scope for BPEL. I want to echo Ron's comments that 
> process designers  
> > > more often than not are not in a position to know what 
> actual values  
> > > should be used and therefore this is something that 
> should be set at
> >  > deployment time by the deployment admin.     
> > 
> > mm1: Ron/Yaron/Prasad, then do you have a proposal? Thanks. [1]
> > 
> > [1] Came up on BPEL requirements call today. :-D
> > 
> >  >> Issue 151: *Links:* Ugo Corda, 22 Jul 2004
> >  >> 
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200407/msg00165.html>    
> >  >> Dieter Koenig1, 23 Jul 2004
> >  >> 
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200407/msg00170.html>    
> >  >> Dieter Roller, 23 Jul 2004
> >  >> 
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200407/msg00171.html>    
> >  >> Ugo Corda, 23 Jul 2004
> >  >> 
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200407/msg00174.html>    
> >  >> Ugo Corda, 23 Jul 2004
> >  >> 
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200407/msg00175.html>    
> >  >> Ron Ten-Hove, 23 Jul 2004
> >  >> 
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200407/msg00183.html>    
> >  >> Prasad Yendluri, 23 Jul 2004
> >  >> 
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200407/msg00184.html>    
> >  >> Prasad Yendluri, 23 Jul 2004
> >  >> 
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200407/msg00184.html>
> >  >> *Changes:* 26 Jul 2004 - new issue
> >  >
> > 
> > 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from 
> the roster of the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/le
ave_workgroup.php.