RE: [wsbpel] "Using BPEL4WS in a Registry" .......

["Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>]

Well, different TCs have different time tables and time constraints. I
don't know about WSRP, but I know for sure that this group has pretty
limited time availability at this point in time.

I would oppose any Reg/Rep-related activity that went beyond the type of
effort currently implied by the UDDI Note review. (Individuals can, of
course, use their time whatever way they want, as long as it does not
impact this TC's schedule).

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:27 PM
> To: Monica J. Martin
> Cc: Ugo Corda; John Evdemon; Eckenfels. Bernd; 
> wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] "Using BPEL4WS in a Registry" .......
> 
> 
> Monica J. Martin wrote:
> 
> > Ugo Corda wrote:
> >
> >> Monica,
> >> I think what you are asking is different than what happened with 
> >> UDDI. There the UDDI group developed the Note, and then 
> asked us to 
> >> review it. But what you are asking, if I understand well your 
> >> proposal, is that this group undertakes the task of developing a 
> >> Reg/Rep Note instead of just reviewing something developed by the 
> >> Reg/Reg group. If that is the case, I would have serious 
> concerns in 
> >> terms of time availability at this phase of our work.
> >>
> > mm1: As I had indicated there is a Reg/Rep team that may wish to
> > engage in such an activity, and others if willing could contribute 
> > and/or review.
> 
> As a case and point I want to point out that what Monica 
> suggests above 
> was done for WSRP TC [j] and I see no reason why the same 
> could not be 
> done for BPEL:
> 
> [j] Using ebXML Registry to Manage WSRP Artifacts 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/7538/wsrp-pf
b-ebxml-tn-draft-05.pdf 


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh