[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 120 - What are the semantics when an initial<receive> has no correlation set?
A very interesting question. For outbound message exchanges (<invoke>s), could a specific portType/operation be used by separate process definitions? I believe so. Is it reasonable to suppose that the c-set (in and out) would be the same across the multiple definitions? The <receive>/<onMessage> case is simpler. I believe that separate process definitions cannot share the same portType/operation. This does open up an interesting question, given our correlation model: can we imagine the ability to share correlated <receive> activities that use the same portType/operation., as long as we can guarantee no ambiguity in correlation at run-time? (no correlating to more than one process instance). Just a thought. I'd rather we didn't go there, myself. -Ron Ugo Corda wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]