[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] New BPEL Issue - add explicit conformance statements / section
Vinkesh O. Mehta
Director Engineering, Process Collaboration Platform
Commerce One, Inc
Tel:
(512)597 6228
vinkesh.mehta@commerceone.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Fletcher [mailto:tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 11:54 AM
To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsbpel] New BPEL Issue - add explicit conformance statements / sectionDear Colleagues,I move that we accept a new "bug" issue into the issues list concerned with adding an explicit set of conformance statements, preferably in a conformance section, to the specification for 'BPEL'. The rationale and a draft proposal is given in the attached document.Resolving this issue will not lead to the addition of any new features.. However, it will enhance and clarify the text in a significant manner and therefore is worth tackling at this time.The process of adding such a conformance section will cause us to think about and address the following questions:For what sort of 'things' can conform to the BPEL specification?For each type of 'thing' for which conformance can be claimed, what precisely does that thing have to be / do / not do to be conformant.Best Regards,
Tony
Tony Fletcher
Technical Advisor
Choreology Ltd.
68, Lombard Street, London EC3V 9L J UKPhone:
+44 (0) 1473 729537
Mobile:
+44 (0) 7801 948219
Fax:
+44 (0) 870 7390077
Web:
Cohesions™
Business transaction management software for application coordination
Work: tony.fletcher@choreology.com
Home: amfletcher@iee.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]