[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 166 - Let's try it again
I don't think that the meaning of atomic is ambigous. It means that the assign is executed has the properties of an ACID transaction. Requiring that an assign is executed as the only activity in a process is far too restrictive (and not necessary)... Cheers, dieter Dieter Roller IBM Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) IBM Academy of Technology Emeritus Phone : +49-7031-164476 Fax : +49-7031-164890 e-mail rol@de.ibm.com "Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> To 10/05/2004 01:54 wsbpeltc AM <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org> cc Please respond to Subject ygoland [wsbpel] Issue - 166 - Let's try it again Problem: The meaning of the term atomic in the BPEL specification's definition of assign is ambiguous. Proposed Change Of Language: The assign activity is atomic, that is, the assign activity MUST be executed as if, for the duration of its execution, it was the only activity in the process being executed. The mechanisms used to implement the previous requirement are implementation dependent. Thoughts? Yaron To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php .
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]