[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue - 169 - transition condition error handling clarification
This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received". The status will be changed to "open" if the TC accepts it as identifying a bug in the spec or decides it should be accepted specially. Otherwise it will be closed without further consideration (but will be marked as "Revisitable")
The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.
Suppose activity A has multiple link sources S1, S2, and S3, with transition conditions, and that the transition condition of S1 is evaluated and the result is an error. The status of S1 is negative according to 12.5.1 of the specification. What will happen for S2 and S3?
E1. The transition conditions of S2 and S3 are evaluated and the status of the links are set accordingly, independently of S1.
E2. The transition conditions of S2 and S3 are not evaluated and the status of the links are set to be negative.
Further suppose that, assuming we chose E1 as the right behavior, evaluating S3's transition condition resulted in an error. Then what will happen?
F1. Only one fault will be thrown from A.
F2. Two faults, one for each error, will be thrown from A.
Submitter's proposal:
Add text to 12.5.1. to explain that the correct behaviors are E1 and F1.
Changes: 18 Oct 2004 - new issue
To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 169 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 169 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar.
To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).
Choreology Anti virus scan completed
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]