[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Clarification on correlation sets example (sec. 10.2)
Ugo, can you please open this as a bug so we can track it? I hate seeing good points fall through the cracks. Thanks, Yaron Ugo Corda wrote: > BPEL implementers at my company found the example in sec. 10.2 > confusing, and I agree with them. Here are a couple of problems: > > 1) The AsynchPurchaseResponse invoke uses the correlation set > PurchaseOrder. But this correlation set is defined as aliases over the > message POMessage, not over the message POResponse used by the invoke. > So there is no connection between the correlation set and the message > used by the activity. This looks like a mistake made when writing the > example, like something missing in the list of alias definitions. > > 2) The same invoke also uses the correlation set Invoice, but there is > no connection between that correlation set and the message used by the > invoke (POResponse). Does this make sense? In other words, is it legal > to set the value of a correlation set in abstract like that, without > referring to a specific message used in the activity? > > Ugo > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the > OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]