making these catches.
Sent: Monday, December
06, 2004 2:05 PM
To: Satish Thatte
Cc: Alex Yiu
Issue 1 and 135 changes
I am browsing the changes you made for Issue 1, 10 and 135.
(a) I noticed that you added the terminationHandler to the process
the scope level.
I guess it is not intentional, right? You mean the other way around?
needs the other way around. Please fix everywhere (doc and XSD).
[I should have caught these problems earlier, when I was synchronizing
XSD for you.]
(b) Few weeks ago, I also found out that the compensationHandler is
available in the process level. I guess that was a left-out in previous
(c) Should the "variableAccessSerializable"
be renamed to "isolated" as a result of Issue 1?
If you agree with all these are some non-intentional editoral mistakes,
forward this message to the editing group list.
Would it be too late to make another round of changes now for Dec F2F?
are important fixes. We should make them as soon as possible, before
Alex Yiu wrote:
Hi, Diane and others,
I have sync'ed up Satish's changes for Issue 135 (TerminationHandler)
And, I have uploaded those 3 XSD files: