Re: [wsbpel] applying extensibility uniformly to <partnerLinkType>,<role>, <property> and <propertyAlias>

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

+1 to (1)
-1 to (2)

	Yaron

Alex Yiu wrote:
> Hi, all,
> 
> I am double checking our current XSD grammar for <partnerLinkType>,
> <role>, <property> and <propertyAlias>.
> 
> I found out that those constructs are actually NOT extensible, unlike
> most of other BPEL constructs. I was quite surprised by that.
> 
> I think we should apply extensibility uniformly to <partnerLinkType>,
> <role>, <property> and <propertyAlias>.
> 
> What do you guys think?
> 
> Most likely I will file two bug issues regarding to extensibility syntax:
> (1) For this uniform extensibility application
> (2) To make BPEL extensibility syntax closer to XSD extensibility syntax
> to avoid ambigious parse tree problems that we discovered during Issue
> 11.1 and etc.
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alex Yiu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the 
> OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>