Re: [wsbpel] Issue 194: Faults for uninitialized partnerLinks

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

Exactly.

Eckenfels. Bernd wrote:
> Hello Yaron,
> 
> I think the problem why a standard fault is needed is, because the
> deployment of the process can not check this statically (in all cases)
> because partnerlink endpoint assignments may be used, and so not all
> links must be initialized by the deployment, right?
> 
> Bernd
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yaron Y. Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:33 PM
> To: Dieter Koenig1
> Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 194: Faults for uninitialized partnerLinks
> 
>  > An uninitialized partner link (partner role) used in an invoke
> activity  > should lead to a BPEL standard fault.
> 
> What would that standard fault be? That's the point of this issue, to
> define the standard fault.
> 
>  > I was under the impression that Issue  > 139 is supposed to cover
> this.
> 
> It easily could have but I figured that 139 is carrying enough on its
> shoulders and the problem in 194 can be solved without having to resolve
> 139.
> 
>  > Maybe I am not getting the point but the scenario about an
> uninitialized  > partner link (my role) is not clear to me. An assign
> from my role must  > always produce a valid service ref. Other
> activities (like receive) should  > not be affected at all.
> 
> The scenario is that someone creates a partnerLink. The deployment
> administrator does not initialize the partnerRole in the partnerLink.
> The very first time the partnerLink is ever used in the process is for
> an Invoke. Since no value was ever placed in the partnerRole there is no
> EPR for the invoke to target and hence an error occurs. But what error?
> That's what the issue is trying to define.
> 
>         Yaron
> 
> 
> 
> Dieter Koenig1 wrote:
>  > An uninitialized partner link (partner role) used in an invoke
>  > activity should lead to a BPEL standard fault. I was under the
>  > impression that Issue
>  > 139 is supposed to cover this.
>  >
>  > Maybe I am not getting the point but the scenario about an
>  > uninitialized partner link (my role) is not clear to me. An assign
>  > from my role must always produce a valid service ref. Other activities
> 
>  > (like receive) should not be affected at all.
>  >
>  > Kind Regards
>  > DK
>  >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>