I think “.”
From: Alex Yiu [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 7:54 AM
To: Yuzo Fujishima
Satish Thatte; Yaron Y. Goland; Alex Yiu
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 199:
Message Variable Naming Scheme
Hi Yuzo and others,
Just want to supplement info that there is a well-defined character sets that
we can use within a NCNAME.
It looks like "." may be a good choice.
Date added: 16 Mar 2005
Date submitted: 16 March 2005
Submitter: Yuzo Fujishima
Champion: Yuzo Fujishima <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Document: Issue 103 resolution
Description: Since Issue 103 has
been resolved without defining concrete naming scheme for message variables, we
need a new issue to discuss it.
BPEL issues list lists three candiates:
$variable.part B. $variable_part C. $variable-part
proposal: I think candidate C is not viable because "-" will be
interpreted as the minus operator.
candiate A and make it illegal to have "." in variable names.
Changes: 16 Mar 2005 - new issue