RE: [wsbpel] Issue 200 - Proposal For Vote

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

This might not take care of all the wierd cases.  Suppose X is part of a sequence that is in an else branch that will not be taken, but there is a link that comes into an activity that precedes X in the sequence.  Isn't that also a similar example?

________________________________

From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@intalio.com]
Sent: Mon 4/25/2005 4:58 PM
To: Trickovic, Ivana
Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; Dumas, Marlon
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 200 - Proposal For Vote



+1

Assaf

Trickovic, Ivana wrote:

>I am resending Marlon's proposal:
>
>Replace the following paragraph in section 12.5.1 (Link Semantics) "If,
>during the performance of structured activity S, the semantics of S
>dictate
>that activity X nested within S will not be performed as part of the
>behavior of S, then the status of all outgoing links from X is set to
>negative. An example is an activity within a branch that is not taken in
>a
>switch activity..."
>
>With the following one:
>"If, during the performance of structured activity S, the semantics of S
>dictate that activity X nested within S will not be performed as part of
>the behavior of S, then after all the incoming control links to X are
>determined, the status of all outgoing links from X is set to negative.
>An
>example is an activity within a branch that is not taken in a switch
>activity..."
>
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Ivana
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
> 
>