RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 157 - Proposal For Vote

["Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>]

In other words, what I would like to see is a note like the following
being added to the 157 proposal under the From-Spec and To-Spec tables:

"As far as copy is concerned, the behavior of partnerLink="ncname"
endpointReference="myRole|partnerRole" is equivalent to a
variable="ncname" of ComplexType bpws:service-ref".

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:28 PM
> To: ygoland@bea.com
> Cc: wsbpeltc
> Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 157 - Proposal For Vote
> 
> 
> > In the 157 model a partnerLink is just another infoset.
> 
> I guess what is not clear is what kind of type constraint we 
> put on this infoset. Should it be a service-ref type? Could 
> it be just a ws-a:Address? I don't remember seeing this 
> spelled out in the latest spec or in the 157 proposal.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS 
> TC that generates this mail.  You may a link to this group 
> and all your TCs in OASIS
> at: 
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
oups.php