Re: Fw: [wsbpel] Issue - 157 - conf call brief recap ... and carryforward ...

[Rania Khalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com>]

Hi Alex,

In this table, is a variable typed using an xsd simple type considered 
EII-with-simple-content (spec says something to that effect I believe, 
regarding $var)? Does copying into a var typed with XSD type then fall 
into the EII column ?

I am not pointing to a potential problem :) just trying to understand 
your table.

tks
Rania

Alex Yiu wrote:

>
> Hi, all,
>
> >From the sub-group conf call, I got an action item to clarify the 
> difference between  "string-value" and "text-node" and verify how it 
> affects the replacement table.
>
> Actually after more thinking, we do not need to modify the "F2F Table" 
> in general ...
>
> -------------------------------------------
> The "F2F Table":
> From \ To
> 	EII
> 	AII
> 	TII
> EII with
> Complex-Content
> 	RE
> 	F
> 	F
> EII with
> Simple-Content
> 	RE
> 	RC
> 	RC
> AII
> 	RC
> 	RC
> 	RC
> TII
> 	RC
> 	RC
> 	RC
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ... I think we just need to add some clarification to the definition 
> of TII and a footnote to this table:
>
> -------------------------------------------
> *Clarified Definition of TII: *(to be added)
> TII is a sequence of _zero or more_ CII. When it is mapped to XPath 
> 1.0 model, it is a generalization of String-Value (which has zero or 
> more characters) and Text Node (which has one or more characters). 
> RValue of a TII can be mapped to a String-Value or a Text Node in 
> XPath 1.0, while LValue of a TII can be only mapped to a Text node.
>
> *Foot-note to the "F2F-Table"*:
>
>     * Information items referenced by the to-spec MUST be a Lvalue.
>       (As stated in Issue 103)
>     * In XPath 1.0 data model, only Text Node can constitute a LValue
>       of TII.
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
>
> I think that should be good enough.
> What do you guys think?
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Alex Yiu
>
>