OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Issue - 228 - Importing propertyAliases

This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received". The status will be changed to "open" if a motion to open the issue is proposed and that motion is approved by the TC. A motion could also be proposed to close it without further consideration. Otherwise it will remain as "received".

The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.

Issue - 228 - Importing propertyAliases

Status: received
Date added: 8 Sep 2005
Categories: Related standards
Date submitted: 07 September 2005
Submitter: Danny van der Rijn
Description: Property aliases are not in keeping with WSDL conventions. They are top level elements in WSDL definitions, but they are not named and are never directly referenced like other top-level WSDL elements (message, portType, binding, service, property, partnerLink,...). A BPEL engine is required to discover them to resolve property references for messages. And these property references do not mention the property alias at all, but rather a property and a variable (which in turn is associated with a message type). So one must scan through all property aliases in known (imported) WSDL and maintain a cross references to these aliases. The question of what Property Aliases are included is not always an easy one to answer. For instance: Perhaps forward references from property or process should be required.
Changes: 8 Sep 2005 - new issue

To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 228 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 228 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar.

To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).

Choreology Anti virus scan completed

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]