[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] repeatUntil description issue
IMHU we
should rename/redefine the activity <repeatUntil> to <doWhile> or
something similar to the regular programming languages. If not may be we can add
a attribute to the <while> activity to skip 'condition'
pre-check during the initial execution. <repeatUntil> does seem to be
a odd activity name for what is defined as it should do.
Van. From: Mehta, Vinkesh (US - Austin) [mailto:vmehta@DELOITTE.com] Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 01:20 PM To: khanderao.kand@oracle.com; pyendluri@webmethods.com; Danny van der Rijn; chris.keller@active-endpoints.com Cc: ws bpel tc Subject: RE: [wsbpel] repeatUntil description issue Khandero,
The <while> activity still exists. This is
provided in addition to <while> as a convience.
-Vinky From: Khanderao Kand [mailto:khanderao.kand@oracle.com] Sent: Fri 11/4/2005 2:05 PM To: pyendluri@webmethods.com; Danny van der Rijn; chris.keller@active-endpoints.com; Mehta, Vinkesh (US - Austin) Cc: ws bpel tc Subject: RE: [wsbpel] repeatUntil description issue "The proposed resolution called the
activity "until" but when it got incorporated into the spec it
got changed to "repeatUntil" which is a definite misnomer. " Would
it be appropriate to go back to the recommended semantics using
<while> ? Any reason for changing it?
Khanderao
This message (including any attachments) contains
confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete
this message.
Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
[v.E.1]
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]