[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Fw: [wsbpel-comment] Public Comment
Correct, "join" is missing in the <receive> syntax in 11.4. (in the latest spec version, this became 10.4.). Kind Regards DK Dieter König Mail: dieterkoenig@de.ibm.com IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Senior Technical Staff Member Tel (office): (+49) 7031-16-3426 Schönaicher Strasse 220 Architect, Business Process Choreographer Fax (office): (+49) 7031-16-4890 71032 Böblingen Member, Technical Expert Council Tel (home office): (+49) 7032-201464 Germany Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com> To 17.02.2006 16:00 wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org cc Subject [wsbpel] Fw: [wsbpel-comment] Public Comment fyi - anyone want to comment? Regards, Diane IBM Emerging Internet Software Standards drj@us.ibm.com (919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123, Fax 845-491-5709 ----- Forwarded by Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 02/17/2006 09:57 AM ----- comment-form@oasis-open.org To 02/17/2006 07:39 AM wsbpel-comment@lists.oasis -open.org cc Please respond to idontwanttobespamed@nowhere.com Subject [wsbpel-comment] Public Comment Comment from: idontwanttobespamed@nowhere.com Name:Ano Nymous Title: Organization: Regarding Specification: WSBPEL 2.0 (p92 committee draft 23rd January 2006) in the receive statement there is no 'join' for the initiate attribute of the correlation element. I think this is a mistake (cf p23). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: wsbpel-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: wsbpel-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]