[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: message subject lines (was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 252 - proposal for discussion)
Friends - please don't start subject lines "Issue NNN -
propos" unless it is meant to be a formal proposal. The scripts
set
things up to change the state to proposed and I have to
edit them back again. "Issue NNN - suggested proposal" or "Issue NNN -
discussion proposal" will be treated as just simple
follow-ups.
I take it this issue was opened yesterday then ?
Sorry I wasn't able to stay on the call.
Peter From: Alex Yiu [mailto:alex.yiu@oracle.com] Sent: 30 March 2006 00:29 To: wsbpeltc Cc: Alex Yiu; 'Dieter Koenig1'; Simon D Moser; Danny van der Rijn Subject: [wsbpel] Issue 252 - proposal for discussion Hi all, This is the proposal for discussion. If I don't hear any major feedback, I would move this into the formal proposal to vote before the end of week. Thanks! In Section "8.3. Expressions" After this paragraph: ------------------------------- WS-BPEL uses several types of expressions, as follows (relevant usage contexts are listed in parentheses):
Add the following paragraph: ------------------------------- When the above first four types of expressions are being used, the corresponding expressions SHOULD return values which are valid according to the corresponding XML Schema types:
The following values conversion and validity checking semantics MUST be applied when WS-BPEL's default binding to XPath 1.0 ("urn:oasis:names:tc:wsbpel:2.0:sublang:xpath1.0") is used as the expression language:
Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]