Re: [wsbpel] Problems with the latest schema

[Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>]

Oh, and <messageExchanges> and <messageExchange> are missing from the schema.

Are these inconsistencies worth opening an issue (or three?) about, to resolve them, or do we just assume the specification is correct and the schema just needs a bit of editing?

-Ron

Ron Ten-Hove wrote:

There are some inconsistencies between the specification text and the "snapshot" of the schema Alex sent out April 29th.

• <if><then>. The production for <if> includes a <then> element, where the specification just calls for an activity.
• tExtensionActivity has had a namespace attribute added to the any child. There is no mention of this, as far as I can find, in the latest draft specification. (If this an attempt to say ##other?)

Cheers,
-Ron