[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fw: [wsbpel] Problems with the latest schema
Resending to all because of delivery problems ;-)
Thomas
Schulze/Germany/I
BM To
ALEX.YIU@ORACLE.COM
03.05.2006 12:40 cc
wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject
Re: [wsbpel] Problems with the
latest schema(Document link: Thomas
Schulze)
Hi Alex,
just to be consistent with the spec text, in the schema the prefix "bpws:"
is still used. Shouldn't it be replaced with "bpel:"?
Best regards,
Thomas Schulze
Alex Yiu
<ALEX.YIU@ORACLE.
COM> To
Alex Yiu <ALEX.YIU@ORACLE.COM>, Ron
02.05.2006 21:53 Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>,
"'wsbpeltc'"
<wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject
Re: [wsbpel] Problems with the
latest schema
Hi Ron and others,
Here is the updated schema (rev 1.36) that addresses the two problems that
Ron pointed out.
Thanks!
Regards,
Alex Yiu
From Alex Yiu <ALEX.YIU@ORACLE.COM>
Sent Tue 5/2/2006 12:17 PM
To Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>; 'wsbpeltc'
<wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
Cc alex.yiu@ORACLE.COM
Subject Re: [wsbpel] Problems with the latest schema
Hi Ron,
Thank for you catching these problems.
For the inconsistencies in the case of <if>-<then> and <messageExchange>,
it is related to the issues (e.g. issue 237) was applied to the spec text
but not to XSD.
I am going to apply these 2 changes during the lunch break here.
On the other hand, I am not sure I follow you 100% on "tExtensionActivity
has had a namespace attribute added to the any child. There is no mention
of this, as far as I can find, in the latest draft specification. (If this
an attempt to say ##other?)" It seems to me that you want to ask for a
clarification spec text, but not on the XSD itself (since the XSD cannot
and does not have any grammar enforcement on the "xsd:any" child). Do I
follow you correctly?
Thanks!
Regards,
Alex Yiu
From Ron Ten-Hove <Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM>
Sent Tue 5/2/2006 6:11 AM
To 'wsbpeltc' <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject Re: [wsbpel] Problems with the latest schema
Oh, and <messageExchanges> and <messageExchange> are missing from the
schema.
Are these inconsistencies worth opening an issue (or three?) about, to
resolve them, or do we just assume the specification is correct and the
schema just needs a bit of editing?
-Ron
Ron Ten-Hove wrote:
There are some inconsistencies between the specification text and the
"snapshot" of the schema Alex sent out April 29th.
<if><then>. The production for <if> includes a <then> element,
where the specification just calls for an activity.
tExtensionActivity has had a namespace attribute added to the
any child. There is no mention of this, as far as I can find,
in the latest draft specification. (If this an attempt to say
##other?)
Cheers,
-Ron(See attached file: wsbpel_main.xsd)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]