[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue - 285 - Proposal to vote
Use <opaqueFrom> to represent the general form of from and get rid of the confusion. This would cause the following changes in the spec text (based on the latest doc updated May 17th): (1)Make the body of the opaque from-spec section : Opaque from-spec A special case for generic opaque assignment is allowed. It represents hiding any of the forms of the 'from-spec' (see section 8.4. Assignment). The new opaqueFrom construct is used for this: <opaqueFrom/> (2)In the section titled Omission, add 'and from-specs as shown below: To enforce this requirement, omittable tokens are restricted to all attributes, activities, expressions, and from-specs (3) Add 'and from-spec' to the first bullet of section 13.4.3: • Explicit opaque tokens – opaque activity, opaque attributes, opaque expression, and opaque from-spec -
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]