[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: new issue: do we want to remove normative wordings in chapter 16"Security Consideration"?
New issue: do we want to remove normative wordings in chapter 16 "Security Consideration"? ----------------------------------- There are 3 occurrences of RFC normative wordings in conjunction with WS-Security in chapter 16 "Security Consideration". e.g. "RECOMMENDED" and "SHOULD". Do we want to remove those normative wordings? This decision would have implication to how and whether WS-Security is added in references section. Submitter Proposal: I tend to think those wordings and references to WS-Security should be non-normative. Because, WS-Security usage is orthogonal and optional to the main concern of WS-BPEL. ----------------------------------- Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]