[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of afault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations
Hi Thomas, I do not see a problem. Can you please explain why you think there would be a problem? Regards, Prasad Thomas Schulze wrote: Hi Prasad, a portType definition like the following would lead to problems, IMHO: <portType name="My.Port.Type"> <operation name="My.Operation"> ... </operation> </portType> Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thomas Schulze Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmet hods.com> To Thomas Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE 24.07.2006 15:53 cc alex.yiu@oracle.com, Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM, wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Hi Thomas, Why do we need such a limitation? The local part is just an NCName (i.e. the LocalPart of the QName). Regards, Prasad Thomas Schulze wrote:Hi Prasad, so the only *new* limitation with this proposal would be that portTypesandoperatins must not contain the "." character when used with BPEL. Right? Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thomas Schulze |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]