[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a faultneeds to be unique across all portTypes and operations
Hi Prasad, in case this portType contains a fault and you like to reference it in <catch> according to your proposal, the faultName QName would look like this: targetNamespace:My.Port.Type.My.Operation.faultName Right? The portType "My" containing the operation "Port" defining the faultName "Type.My.Operation.faultName" is not meant here. Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thomas Schulze IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, IBM Lab Boeblingen WSS - Business Process Solutions - BPC Development 2 Schoenaicher Strasse 220, 71032 Boeblingen, Kst. 3056, Geb. 7103-02, Raum 0006 Phone: +49-7031-16-3094 (T/L: *120-3094); E-Mail: ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmet hods.com> To Thomas Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE 24.07.2006 16:14 cc alex.yiu@oracle.com, Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM, wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Hi Thomas, I do not see a problem. Can you please explain why you think there would be a problem? Regards, Prasad Thomas Schulze wrote: Hi Prasad, a portType definition like the following would lead to problems, IMHO: <portType name="My.Port.Type"> <operation name="My.Operation"> ... </operation> </portType> Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thomas Schulze Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmet hods.com> To Thomas Schulze/Germany/IBM@IBMDE 24.07.2006 15:53 cc alex.yiu@oracle.com, Ronald.Ten-Hove@Sun.COM, wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject Re: [wsbpel] new issue - clarification on whether the QName of a fault needs to be unique across all portTypes and operations Hi Thomas, Why do we need such a limitation? The local part is just an NCName (i.e. the LocalPart of the QName). Regards, Prasad Thomas Schulze wrote: Hi Prasad, so the only *new* limitation with this proposal would be that portTypes and operatins must not contain the "." character when used with BPEL. Right? Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thomas Schulze
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]