[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 305
Hi Thomas, I came across the propertyAlias queryLanguage issue during my edits. You are correct in that the spec currently says that propertyAlias queryLanguage inherits its value from the process default (Appendix C). This makes no sense. I will include this change with my proposal. I have gotten some feedback from others and it seems that there is support for removing queryLanguage altogether from the <process>. This was the original proposal for fixing this issue but after looking at the number of edits required we thought that restoring the <query> option to the from-spec and to-spec would require fewer changes. In fact, I found some text in Section 7.3 that is still referring to the <query> in the from-spec and to-spec so it ended up being fewer changes than I had originally expected. -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Schulze [mailto:ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com] Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 4:30 AM To: Mark Ford Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 305 Hi Mark, I agree that the fourth <to> variant should be an expression instead of a query, because there is no context. And I agree that then the queryLanguage attribute can be removed from <process> because with the previous change queries can't no longer occur in a BPEL process. The propertyAlias is the only remaining place, but it's outside of the BPEL. But when removing the queryLanguage attribute from <process> there is no longer a default. So we need a default (XPath 1.0 I assume) for the queryLanguage attribute in propertyAlias/query what solves another problem: If you currently have two processes which want to use the same property/propertyAlias (no queryLanguage attribute specified in the propertyAlias/query), but the set queryLanguage is different for both processes you can't use this propertyAlias in the context of both processes. You either need to duplicate the property and propertyAlias to solve the problem or you need to change the set queryLanguage in one process. Removing the queryLanguage attribute from <process> and introducing a default for the queryLanguage attribute in propertyAlias/query would solve that problem in an elegant way, too. Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thomas Schulze "Mark Ford" <mark.ford@active -endpoints.com> To <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org> 27.07.2006 18:18 cc Subject [wsbpel] Issue 305 As we discussed this specification internally it became clear that the main difference between queries and expressions is that queries have a context while expressions do not. One way of achieving this is to remove queryLanguage from the process altogether. This is how the issue was originally framed in the issue description. Another way of achieving this same goal but with fewer changes would be to restore the query option in the <from> and <to> variants that had queries with a variable as the context. Therefore, I propose the following to restore the distinction between queries and expressions: 1. Change existing <to> query variant to match existing <from> expression variant. <to expressionLanguage=”expr-lang”>expr</to> 2. restore the query option in the <from> and <to> that take variables and have them look and behave the same as propertyAlias queries <from variable=”BPELVariableName” part=”NCName”?> <query queryLanguage=”query-lang”?>? query-exp </query> </from> <to variable=”BPELVariableName” part=”NCName”?> <query queryLanguage=”query-lang”?>? query-exp </query> </to> I appreciate any feedback on this issue before I embark on submitting a formal proposal. The proposal will include the current version of the spec with only the edits for this issue appearing as changes. Thanks
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]