[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] blockDefault discussion
I agree. It would conflict with the explicit extension point, that is <extensionActivity>. Regards, Ivana >-----Original Message----- >From: Thomas Schulze [mailto:ThomasSchulze@de.ibm.com] >Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:04 PM >To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: [wsbpel] blockDefault discussion > >As Alex points out here the TC needs to decide if an extension >is allowed >to substitute elements from the BPEL namespaces with extension >elements. >The spec currently does not forbid it explicitly but we think >the TC needs >to discuss if silence in this case means this kind of >extension is allowed >or it is not allowed. If it is not allowed, all schemas should >reflect that >by containing the attribute blockDefault="#all" on the schema element. > >My preference is that we don't allow this extension mechanism, >means we add >to all schemas the attribute blockDefault="#all". If we don't >add it, the >following example shows how the BPEL 2.0 language is allowed >to be extended >beside the explicitly modeled and in the spec clearly >described extension >points: > >Schema for the extension: > schema tns = myTNS > > <element name="myEmpty" type="myTNS:tMyEmpty" > substitutionGroup="bpel:empty"/> > <complexType name="tMyEmpty"> > <complexContent> > <restriction base="bpel:tEmpty"/> > </complexContent> > </complexType> > >Possible, BPEL snippet: > ... > <bpel:scope> > <myTNS:myEmpty/> > </bpel:scope> > ... > >IMHO this is not a desired kind of extension mechanism. > >Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > > Thomas Schulze > > > > > > alex.yiu@oracle.c > > om > > > To > 08.08.2006 22:32 >wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org > > cc > > > > Subject > [wsbpel] blockDefault >discussion > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mr Alex Yiu added the following comment to the >ws-bpel_2.0_schema_2006_08_08_1400PDT.zip document in the OASIS Web >Services Business Process Execution Language (WSBPEL) TC Group. > >One left over discussion issue is: whether to apply >blockDefault="#all" in >the schema. > > >View Document Details and Comments: >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/document.ph >p?document_id=19622 > > >Download Document: >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/download.ph >p/19622/ws-bpel_2.0_schema_2006_08_08_1400PDT.zip > > >PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email >application >may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and >paste >the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. > >- Administration > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]