Issue - R32 - Correction needed in Template Process Example in Section 15.2

[ws-bpel issues list editor<peter@furniss.co.uk>]

This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received". The status will be changed to "open" if a motion to open the issue is proposed and that motion is approved by the TC. A motion could also be proposed to close it without further consideration. Otherwise it will remain as "received".

The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.

Issue - R32 - Correction needed in Template Process Example in Section 15.2

Status: received
Date added: 8 Nov 2006
Date submitted: 8 Nov 2006
Submitter: Alex Yiu
Description:

After reviewing the example in section 15.2, I think there are some changes needed:

1. Syntax correction from:

   <condition>"##opaque"</condition>
   

   to:

   <condition opaque="yes" />
   

2. Rectified opaque from spec usage: (because of another bug fix in other part of the spec)

   <from opaque="yes" />
   

   to

   <opaqueFrom />
   

3. Simplify partnerLink usage: Potentially, we can simplify partnerLink usage (not a bug). The number of partnerLink used in this example is a bit too many. It makes the example harder to understand. I would suggest to combine some of them.
   • "ordering" + "orderingResponse" + "orderingConfirmation" => "ordering" (initializePartnerRole="no")
   • "shipper" + "shipperResponse" => "shipper" (initializePartnerRole="yes")
   • "invoiceProcessor" + "invoiceResponse" => "invoiceProcessor" (initializePartnerRole="no")
   • "shipperRequester" unchanged (initializePartnerRole="no")

Changes: 8 Nov 2006 - new issue

---

To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - R32 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - R32 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar.

To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document