RE: [wsbpel] potential adoption tc

["Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>]

There is no point doing the errata then in an adoption TC!
The oasis process is very vague on ownership of specs, esp after a TC goes out of business. For example, nothing rules out more than
one TC doing errata, provided it is in it's charter. This of course makes no sense, but in my opinion, unless a new TC claims
ownership of the BPEL spec it is a possibility.

Martin.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: John Evdemon [mailto:John.Evdemon@microsoft.com] 
>Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 3:09 PM
>To: Martin Chapman; 'Diane Jordan'; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [wsbpel] potential adoption tc
>
>
>Martin Chapman  wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure it's a good idea to conflate adoption with
>> spec management.
>
>Perhaps I should reword my question: SHOULD an adoption TC 
>publish a revised spec incorporating changes from the 
>accumulated errata?
>
>Probably not is my guess.
>
>