Re: [wsdm-comment] Public Comment

[Heather Kreger <kreger@us.ibm.com>]

The WDSM TC has posted its position
on its dependencies at: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsdm/200503/msg00047.html.
This response is also on the WSDM home
page at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=wsdm.

I have just 2 comments on this story:


It's also interesting to note that bloggers
quoted in this 'story' were both from companies who did NOT actively participate
in the technical development of WSDM, nor the final drive to OASIS standard
status. 

Since the 'story' seems a little one-sided,
I'd like to offer a counterpoint blog from Mark Potts at http://h20276.www2.hp.com/blogs/potts.
 

Thank you,
Heather Kreger
WSDM Co-Chair
kreger@us.ibm.com

comment-form@oasis-open.org

03/19/2005 02:53 PM

Please respond to
sysman.us

To	wsdm-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject	[wsdm-comment] Public Comment

Comment from: sysman.us@gmail.com

We published a story about WSDM, submitted by a reader,
at our our news site: <a href=""http://sysman.us/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=6">WSDM"
Not Ready for Prime Time?</a>