OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsdm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [wsdm] Roadmap draft


Title: Message
Problem is that I see Policies in the diagram, but not at the bottom.  :-)  They are dependent on the things to which they apply.  So, I think that they are there - but maybe alongside the Management/Application Integration and B2B boxes.  This implies that policies can be everywhere and are transmitted using the OASIS, W3C infrastructure.
 
Andrea 
-----Original Message-----
From: Heather Kreger [mailto:kreger@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:18 PM
To: Andrea Westerinen
Cc: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsdm] Roadmap draft

Andrea,
Good point.

How about we just remove the word 'OASIS' from the 'Policies' box?

I wasn't trying to be specific on who created the policies or even how they are defined at the moment, but more that there are actual Policies that are used across the platform, by the management domain as well as by the other domains. So, Security guys have some policies which do use policy attachments. We, WSDM, may eventually define some policies. I hope its not limited to capabilities matching. So, you are right, actual policies (and any relevant policy standards) may be developed in the appropriate standards domain for the work and is not limited to OASIS.

Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572

To: "'Mark Ellison'" <ellison@ieee.org>, Heather Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <Winston_Bumpus@Dell.com>
cc: <wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: RE: [wsdm] Roadmap draft




I have a bit of a problem with the figure in Section 1.2.  Policies are not being defined by OASIS - since something like WS-Policy is about attachments and could be used for capabilities and requirements.  As such, this could be a very simplistic "matching" policy - but is not policy in the way that it is used in the industry.  Policies are about data - making decisions or taking actions based on conditions. 
 
Is there another word that we could use in the bottom right-hand box?  Maybe "Capabilities and Requirements Matching" or something?
 
Andrea
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Ellison [mailto:ellison@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 3:50 PM
To: Heather Kreger; Winston_Bumpus@Dell.com
Cc: wsdm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsdm] Roadmap draft


Hi Heather, Winston,

I liked the diagram in section 1.2...

Attached is a copy with some suggested grammatical changes with tracking enabled -

Regards,

Mark


Heather Kreger wrote:

Hi,
Here is a draft of the Roadmap, I'm interested in your feedback on this,
I've taken a stab at 'future' content based on historical conversations I
remember. We should update the 1.0 list according to the list John
DeCarlo's been keeping.
We'll have to criticize this by email, and can discuss on next weeks call
as well,
(See attached file: WSDM.roadmap.doc)

Flame away,
Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"kreger@us.ibm.com919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572
 



To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgroup.php.





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]