[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsdm] Discovery Scenarios [fred]
Tom Maguire wrote: > John DeCarlo <jdecarlo@mitre.org> wrote on 05/21/2004 09:24:58 AM: > > >>+1 from me, too. >> >>If WSDM specifies a "TellMeWhatResourcesYouProvideManageabilityFor" type >>of operation, it would have to be optional (except in some profiles, >>should we get there). > > > +1 However, I'm not sure that WSDM needs to define this > interface. WS-ServiceGroup should be investigated to see if it fits the > bill. I thought that was one of the reasons to submit WSDM requirements to the WSRF TC. [snip] >>And maybe eventually the description might well say it is deprecated >>because of the full adoption of Service Groups or other registry >>mechanisms (or relying on a notification infrastructure) for Manageable >>Resources. > > > ServiceGroup is just an interface why would we not adopt it now? I don't see why not. Just not sure I understand would it would take to adopt it. For instance, having this hypothetical operation return a Service Group makes a lot of sense to me. Then all the features of a Service Group can be leveraged, such as treating it as just another type of registry. OTOH, requiring that each Manageability Provider register every manageable resource with a third party that will create a Service Group out of it may not be the way we want to go initially. -- John DeCarlo, The MITRE Corporation, My Views Are My Own
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]