Just for clarification, I think this means that we are now dependent on
the ws-a spec to the w3c and some versions of wsrf & wsn which are
dependent upon other ws-a specs. They're converging, but I don't know
of semi-stable versions that have been pseudo-published (if that's
vague enough) for those. I could, of course, be wrong.
I don't know that it's a big deal -- just some 'splainin' to do -- but
it does introduce [yet another] area of uncertainty in the event things
don't quite match up.
Are there any issues with extant tools based on WS-A specs?
Heather Kreger wrote:
This seems reasonable to me.
I recommond that we make WSDM MUWS dependent on the WS-Addressng
submission to the W3C.
Any objections?
Heather Kreger
STSM, Web Services Lead Architect for SWG Emerging Technologies
Author of "Java and JMX: Building Manageable Systems"
kreger@us.ibm.com
919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572
Steve Graham/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Steve Graham/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
11/17/2004 07:27 AM
|
|
I believe it is preferable to move WSDM to reference the W3C member
submission version of WSA.
I believe that WSN and WSRF are doing that anyway.
In WSRF, issue WSRF43 [1] was resolved at the Oct F2F, with the
resolution being:
"Update specifications that reference WS-Addressing to
refer to the version submitted to the W3C. This includes all namespace
references and examples. Make sure to update the WSDL and schema in
addition to the specification text. The version to reference is the
August 2004 version submitted to the W3C."
In WSN, issue WSN2.15 [2] was also resolved at the Oct F2F, with the
resolution being:
"Agreed Approach: Editors to borrow text from the WS-RF
issue #30 resolution."
Now, WSRF30 is a slightly different issue (deals with use of wsa:Action
MIH), but WSRF30 cross references WSRF43. I suspect that the
resolution to WSN2.15 should reference WSRF43, but that seems to be a
matter we should take up with the WSN TC.
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsrf/download.php/10042/WSRF_IssuesList.doc
[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsn/download.php/9948/WSN_IssuesList1.75.doc
sgg
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++
|
To
|
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
[wsdm] Ws-addressing version
|
|
What version of WS-Addressing do we want to reference? The one
submitted
to W3C in August? Or the one used by version 1.2 of the WSRF/WSN
specs
(that'd the March 2003 one, two versions older than the
W3C-submitted
one).
On the one hand it would make sense to align with the one used by
WSRF,
on the other hand it seems a bit silly for a new spec like ours to
reference such an old version.
Thoughts?
William
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the
roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsdm/members/leave_workgroup.php.
|